Charles G D Roberts |
"Not having asked as many questions as we should
have when we were young, we have no information on the date of this commission,
nor how it might have come about. We had supposed that the arresting portrait of
Roberts that we have in our collection was either the very portrait that had
fulfilled the commission (somehow returned to the artist), or a preliminary version
of it.
from the Toronto Telegram Jan 10, 1935 |
"There’s a problem with it, though. It’s difficult
to be sure, but the picture in the Telegram clipping looks more like a
photograph of the man himself, rather than a photograph of a painting. The
original photo, which would have been helpful, could not be found in the
Telegram’s photo archives, which are now divided between the Sun newspaper archives
and a special collection at York University. We know that Bertha often painted
portraits from photographs, especially where sittings would have been difficult
to arrange, for one reason or another. The newspaper clipping could show a
photograph which she had used as a model for a painting, which she might have
lent to the Telegram. In any case, the evidence of the clippings suggests that
Bertha’s commissioned portrait of Roberts was painted some time in the early
1930s, very probably by the beginning of 1935, and that it may have been quite
a different picture from the one we have.
"Searching the internet, DB came across a photograph
of Roberts that appears on the dust jacket of Sir Charles G. D. Roberts, a Biography by Elsie Pomeroy, published
in 1943. This photograph bears a
striking resemblance to the painting in our collection [though DB noted that in
our painting, the subject is lit from the opposite side, an interesting
variation, artistically]. Pomeroy’s book gives no information whatsoever about
the source of the photo (an oddity, because there is comprehensive information
cited about every other photo in the book). It simply states that the photo is
from 1936. If this date is correct (it may not be, but sadly there is no
obvious way to verify it), it suggests that the portrait in our collection was
painted later than the commissioned portrait – perhaps even years later, if the
model photograph was from the biography.
"When attempting to trace the image, DB visited the Northern
District Branch of the Toronto Public Library (40 Orchard View Blvd), where a
copy of Pomeroy’s book resided at that time (it has since been moved to the Canadiana
Reference Stacks of the North York Central Library). There was no dust jacket,
but the same photo appears as the frontispiece. In an eerie twist, he found
that the frontispiece picture had been scored with pencil lines, one horizontal
and one vertical, each bisecting the picture, in much the same way that Bertha
used to do with photographs from which she intended to make a portrait.
"We are left with yet another mystery. Was there really
a commissioned portrait? What was
it like? Was it destroyed, or does it still exist? We are also left
with a fine portrait, possibly from a later date, in which we believe the
artist took much satisfaction."